RC

Reading Comprehension

Reading Comprehension 057

Passage Ian Fleming’s evil globe-fish – also known as puffer, blowfish, swellfish, or in Japanese, fugu – is one of the most mysterious creatures of the sea. It is perhaps the world’s most deadly fish, yet in Japan the honorable fugu is the epitome of gourmet dining. About 100 species of puffers in several closely related families can be found throughout the world. Their most obvious characteristic is their ability to balloon out from a reasonable fish shape into a sphere two or three times large. When frightened, excited, or annoyed, they gulp water, or even air, into a sac on the belly. It swells inside their tough, elastic skin, like an inner tube inside a tire, so as to discourage predators or intimidate rivals. When the fish feels safe, it squirts out the water or releases the air, deflating to its normal shape. In Japan, eating fugu has been the gastronomic version of Russian roulette for centuries. Sometimes a diner stills losses the gamble. His chopsticks clatter to the table from nerveless fingers; he pales; his breathing labours. It is often the subject of traditional senryu verse. Last night he and I ate fugu; Today, I help carry his coffin “It’s a terrible death,” a Japanese restaurant owner told me. “Even though you can think very clearly, your arms and legs become numb. It becomes impossible to sit up. You can think but cannot speak, cannot move, and soon cannot breathe.” Why the Japanese, who venerate hygiene, should make a ritual of eating deadly poisonous fish, is difficult for foreigners to comprehend. fugu ovaries, intestine, and liver can be so deadly that if even a tiny touch of them is left in the flesh, the gourmet dies, often within minutes. About 60 percent of puffer poisonings prove fatal. When eating fugu, the diner puts his life in the hands of the chef. Before practicing their risky art, all fugu cooks must be licensed and must take intensive courses, extensive apprenticeship, and written exams. To eat fugu liver is the height of exotica. It is one of the most poisonous parts of the fish, and techniques for detoxifying it are not dependable. Chefs are prohibited from serving fugu liver, but they sometimes relent under the impassioned pleas of gourmets. Mitsugoro Bando had four servings and paid the ultimate price. Despite the danger, demand for puffers is increasing so fast that the Japanese fishing grounds are being depleted. Today the Japanese are successfully culturing the fish. Every year from October through March, millions of diners bet their lives on not getting fatally poisoned. Thanks to strict regulation of restaurants and wholesalers, the number that loses decreases each year. But this droll and perposterous fish with the goggling eyes, swollen belly, and floppy fins remains the world’s most deadly feast. The enigma of the fugu is summed up in the traditional verse: Those who eat fugu soap are stupid But who’s who don’t eat fugu soup are also stupid. Questions Please Log in or Register to view the questions. Answers #msg { color: #333300; background:#ffcc99; border: 1px solid #993300; font: 14px Georgia; width: 600px; text-align: center; } Q1 Your answer was wrong for this question. The correct answer is: bQ2 Your answer was wrong for this question. The correct answer is: bQ3 Your answer was wrong for this question. The correct answer is: cQ4 Your answer was wrong for this question. The correct answer is: dQ5 Your answer was wrong for this question. The correct answer is: dNumber of Questions: 5Number of Attempts: 5Correct Answers: 0 Your Overall Score is -5. This is a below average score. Please give a better try in next test Do you like to you update your new score ? YES Accuracy Indicator Performance Pointer

Reading Comprehension 056

Passage The making of machines to make machines was one of the most important aspects of the Industrial Revolution, but it must not be forgotten that the making of machine tools can be traced back a great many centuries. The lathe, for example, is the oldest known machine tool and dates back to antiquity. However, it was not until the late 17th Century that clockmakers, builders of scientific instruments, and furniture and gun makers began the changeover from wood-working lathes to ones capable of machining tool steel. They had a need for a variety of gear cutting, grinding, precise screw-cutting machines to fabricate their products. The development of precise machine tools for these purposes profoundly affected the art of navigation and paved the way for the industrial machine tools of the late 18th and early l9th Centuries, which made possible the construction of the steam engine and the machines it had to power. This in turn made possible the great advances in standards of living for many people throughout western Europe and North America.

The first satisfactory screw-cutting lathes were made by an English instrument maker, Jesse Ramsden (1735-1800) in 1770. His work had wide ramifications, probably inspiring a large screw-cutting lathe first designed by Henry Maudslay (1771-1831) in 1797 and produced in 1800. The micrometer for the bench work on this machine was accurate to 1/10,000 of an inch. Maudslay had a long-lasting influence on the British machine tool industry. Three of his assistants developed other variants of machine tools. Richard Roberts (1789-1864) introduced a more powerful lathe, and in 1817 built the first planing machine for metal, and shortly thereafter, his first gear cutting machine. He also improved the spinning mule and designed a punching machine for making rivet holes in 1847. Joseph Whitworth (1803-1887) improved and enlarged many of the early machine tools, which he first encountered in Maudslay's works. He is best known for constructing a measuring machine that could measure to an accuracy of one-millionth of an inch, and for first suggesting the standardization of screw threads in English industry. Probably Maudslay's greatest protege was James Nasmyth (1808-1890), whose inventions include the milling machine and a planing machine or shaper.

However, the prestige of being the greatest machine tool maker in England probably belongs to John Wilkinson, the Ironmaster (1728-1808). He invented the cylinder boring machine (the boring mill, circa 1775) that made Watt's steam engine a practical source of power. He was the first to demonstrate that coke made from coal could be used in place of charcoal to produce quality iron on a large scale. He designed in 1779, the first all-iron bridge constructed in England (1781), and his factory cast the iron for it. During the late 1780s he minted his own "wage tokens" when the English government failed to produce enough coins for him to pay his workers. At the same time (1787) he built the first iron barge to transport his iron products down the River Severn. He was an able businessman and an industrial genius, whose name is attached today to Wilkinson razor blades. Wilkinson offers us a significant example of the power of the producer, a man who was an inventor, creator, builder, and businessman.

Although Wilkinson took out a number of patents during his life, when he made his boring mill in 1775, he felt that secrecy was better protection against the pirating of his invention than a patent complete with drawings. He was probably right, for his machine works were the only ones to bore cylinders for the firm of Boulton and Watt for 25 years. In England, the first patent had been granted in 1552. Their abuse by the Crown for the issue of money-raising grants of monopoly let Parliament in 1624 to declare that such privileges were grievous and inconvenient. However, the Crown was left free to grant exclusive rights under letters patent for not more than twenty-one years to "the first and true inventor or inventors of manufactures." Neo-Tech businessmen, like Wilkinson, realized that state protection did not always accomplish what it set out to do, and that he was better off relying upon trade secrecy rather than seeking government assistance in protecting his invention.

Questions Please Log in or Register to view the questions. Answers #msg { color: #333300; background:#ffcc99; border: 1px solid #993300; font: 14px Georgia; width: 600px; text-align: center; } Q1 Your answer was wrong for this question. The correct answer is: aQ2 Your answer was wrong for this question. The correct answer is: cQ3 Your answer was wrong for this question. The correct answer is: aQ4 Your answer was wrong for this question. The correct answer is: bQ5 Your answer was wrong for this question. The correct answer is: aNumber of Questions: 5Number of Attempts: 5Correct Answers: 0 Your Overall Score is -5. This is a below average score. Please give a better try in next test Do you like to you update your new score ? YES Accuracy Indicator Performance Pointer

Reading Comprehension 055

Passage Compared with other experimental sciences, astronomy has certain limitations. First apart from meteorites, the Moon, and the nearer planets, the objects of study arc inaccessible and cannot be manipulated although nature sometimes provides special conditions, such as eclipses and other temporary effects. The astronomer must content himself with studying radiation emitted or reflected from celestial bodies.

Second, from the Earth's surface these arc viewed through a thick atmosphere that completely absorbs most radiation except within certain "windows", wavelength regions in which the radiation can pass through the atmosphere relatively freely in the optical, near-infrared, and radio bands of the electromagnetic spectrum: and even in these windows the atmosphere has considerable effects. For light, these atmospheric effects arc as follows: (1) some absorption that dims the radiation somewhat, even in a clear sky; (2) refraction, which causes slight shin in the direction so that the object appears in a slightly different place; (3) scintillation (twinkling): Le., fluctuations in brightness of effectively point-like sources such as stars, fluctuations that are, however, averaged out for objects with larger images, such as planets (the ionosphere, an ionised layer high in the atmosphere, and interplanetary medium have similar effects on radio sources):  (4) image movement because of atmospheric turbulence ("bad seeing") spreads the image of a tiny point over an angle of nearly one arc second or more on the celestial sphere (one arc second equals 1/3,600 degrees); and (5) background light from the night sky The obscuring effects of the atmosphere and its clouds are reduced by placing observing stations on mountains, preferably in desert regions (e.g., southern California and Chile), and away from city lights.

The effects arc eliminated by observing from high-altitude aircraft, balloons, rockets, space probes, and artificial satellites. From stations outside all or most of the atmosphere, gamma rays and X-rays -- that is, high-energy radiation at extremely short wave-lengths and far-ultraviolet and. far-infrared radiation, all completely absorbed by the atmosphere at ground level observatories, can be measured. At radio wave-lengths between about one centimetre and 20 meters, the atmosphere (even when cloudy) has little effect, and man-made radio signals arc the chief interference

Third, the Earth is a spinning, shifting, and wobbling platform. Spin on its axis causes alternation of day and night and an apparent rotation of the celestial sphere with stars moving from east to west.Ground-based telescopes use a mounting that makes it possible to neutralize the rotation of Earth relative to the stars: with an equatorial mounting driven a proper speed, the direction of the telescope tube can be kept constant for hours while the Earth turns under the mounting. Large radio telescopes usually have vertical and horizontal axes (altazimuth mounting), with their pointing continuously controlled by a computer. In addition to the daily spin, there are much more gradual effects, called precession and nutation

Gravitational action of the Sun and Moon on the Earth's equatorial bulge causes the Earth's axis to process like a top or gyroscope, gradually tracing out a circle on the celestial sphere in about 26,000 years, and also to nutate or wobble slightly in a period of I 8.6 years. The Earth's rotation and orbital motion provide the basic standard of directions of stars, so that uncertainties in the rate of these motions can lead to quite small but important uncertainties in measurements of stellar movements

Questions Please Log in or Register to view the questions. Answers #msg { color: #333300; background:#ffcc99; border: 1px solid #993300; font: 14px Georgia; width: 600px; text-align: center; } Q1 Your answer was wrong for this question. The correct answer is: bQ2 Your answer was wrong for this question. The correct answer is: dQ3 Your answer was wrong for this question. The correct answer is: dQ4 Your answer was wrong for this question. The correct answer is: dQ5 Your answer was wrong for this question. The correct answer is: cQ6 Your answer was wrong for this question. The correct answer is: bNumber of Questions: 6Number of Attempts: 6Correct Answers: 0 Your Overall Score is -6. This is a below average score. Please give a better try in next test Do you like to you update your new score ? YES Accuracy Indicator Performance Pointer

Reading Comprehension 054

Passage

EVEN BEFORE THE ADVENT OF TV telecasts, a tour of England by an Indian cricket team always had enormous appeal for the fans back home. The BBC radio commentary enabled the Indian fan to follow the post-lunch play after returning from work. The feel of the English summer game being played against the backdrop of everyday life was vividly conveyed by commentators like Brian Johnstone: “And as Kapil Dev runs into bowl, another train pulls out of Warwick Station.” Apart from hearing the cricket, you could read it in the morning newspaper. There were the likes of The Times of India cricket correspondent K N Prabhu who was never shy of reminding the Indian fan that the summer game in England was played at venues steeped in history. And then there was the swashbuckling Aussie all-rounder turned correspondent Keith Miller whose introduction to his report on India creating history by winning its first series in England in the summer of 1971 at the Oval is still fresh in the memories of hard-boiled cricket fans: “India, you finally did it! But, phew, what a nerve-tingling, nail-biting affair!” .Miller went on to mix metaphors while writing about leg-spinner chandrashekar’s deliveries “snaking off the pitch like greased lightning” as he won the Oval Test for India. The low point would have to punch magazine’s cartoon on India’s score of 42 all out in the Lord’s Test in the 1974 tour where a female spectator tells her hubby.”You should have gone to the loo before we left home. The entire Indian second innings is over!” Once the India-England Test series starts in July, we will be treated to the telecast on ESPN and the commentary by legends like Botham, Gower, Holding and Gavaskar, backed by Hussain and Shastri. Each time fast bowler Harmison’s deliveries go so far down the legside that they cannot be collected by diving wicket-keeper Prior, Gower is liable to quip that “The good old Harmy radar is not quite working today!” There could be a few humorous asides on the BCCI’s inability to find a coach for the Indian team. However, even the call-a-spade-a shovel Botham could refrain from pointing out the only reason why the BCCI chose the 72-year-old Chandu Borde at the last minute as the manager for the Indian tour was because c K Nayudu(born on October31, 1895) and DB Deodhar (January 14, 1892) were not around! You could even call the commentary the icing on the cake in terms of the appeal the game has for millions, especially in the country which Nirad G Chaudhuri once termed as “the Continent of Circe”. Once the England-India Test series starts, walk down any Indian road - high street or low - and you will find quite a few people rooted on the pavement and looking intently through the shop window of an electronic store which has rows of TVs stacked one on top of the other, all tuned in to the live cricketing action. It is the kind of vision which could have inspired Simon & Garfunkel to sing. “And in the naked light I saw Ten thousand people, even more People talking without speaking, /People listening without hearing,/People writing songs that voices never share. And no one dare/Disturb the sound of silence.”

Questions Please Log in or Register to view the questions. Answers #msg { color: #333300; background:#ffcc99; border: 1px solid #993300; font: 14px Georgia; width: 600px; text-align: center; } Q1 Your answer was wrong for this question. The correct answer is: aQ2 Your answer was wrong for this question. The correct answer is: aQ3 Your answer was wrong for this question. The correct answer is: cQ4 Your answer was wrong for this question. The correct answer is: aQ5 Your answer was wrong for this question. The correct answer is: cNumber of Questions: 5Number of Attempts: 5Correct Answers: 0 Your Overall Score is -5. This is a below average score. Please give a better try in next test Do you like to you update your new score ? YES Accuracy Indicator Performance Pointer

Reading Comprehension 053

Passage THE truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth is a fine aspiration. But, as Pontius Pilate said to Jesus, “What is truth?” For decades, researchers have grappled with the problem of creating a machine that can tell, definitively, whether a person is lying. Until recently, their efforts have been unsatisfactory. The current generation of lie-detection technologies has been put under scientific scrutiny and found wanting. But science, ever resourceful, is coming up with new ideas. Soon, at least in some cases, that old courtroom platitude may itself come to resemble the truth more closely. Mention the term “lie detector” to most people and they will probably think of the polygraph. This was invented in 1921. It looks at changes in a range of physiological phenomena—such as a person's breathing rate, pulse, blood pressure and perspiration—that take place while a suspect is being questioned. These are supposed to indicate if the answer given is untrue. Polygraph evidence is accepted in many jurisdictions, notably in America. Although American military courts will not allow it, the only civilian courts there that have deemed it completely inadmissible are those of the District of Columbia and the Fourth Circuit (the group of states immediately south of the Mason-Dixon line). In other states its use is at the judge's discretion. Unfortunately for people in areas where they are still used, polygraphs do not work—or, more charitably, are easily duped. That was the conclusion of a report released in 2002 by America's National Academy of Sciences. Another apparently promising candidate, voice analysis, does not seem to work either. There are repeated claims that tremors in a person's voice can reveal when he is lying. But a study by Mitchell Sommers of the University of Washington in St Louis, showed that—at least in the case of a system called Vericator—it is not as reliable as had been thought. Voice analysis can, Dr Sommers concluded, indicate an individual's level of stress. But that does not correlate with dishonesty. The problem with both polygraphy and voice analysis is that they rely on second-hand signs of lying which a good actor can suppress. Furthermore, someone who is telling the truth might exhibit just these signals, because the very act of being questioned by the authorities is stressful. Instead, current research is looking directly at the source of lies, the brain itself. Daniel Langleben, of the University of Pennsylvania, in Philadelphia, uses a brain-scanning technique called functional magnetic-resonance imaging to probe his subjects' honesty. The lie which those subjects are asked to tell is a small one: they have to persuade Dr Langleben, or one of his assistants, that they are holding a particular playing card when often they are actually holding a different one. Each successful deception earns a subject $20. The researchers have not had to hand out much cash, though. The brains of lying subjects light up in particular places—notably the anterior cingulate gyrus and left prefrontal cortex—in ways that they do not in the honest. A second technique for probing the brain directly during questioning is the “cognosensor” developed by Britton Chance, who also works at the University of Pennsylvania. His subjects wear a headband that beams infra-red light through their skulls and into their brains. Part of this light is reflected back, and the pattern of reflection indicates activity in the tissue it has been reflected from—in particular, changes  in the flow of blood to that tissue. According to Dr Chance, different emotional disturbances have characteristic reflection patterns. And when a person lies, more of the light is reflected, and the reflections come from a wider area, than when he is telling the truth. A third brain-probing lie-detection technique, based on electroencephalography (EEG), has actually made it out of the laboratory and into the courtroom. Lawrence Farwell, the founder of Brain Fingerprinting Labs in Seattle, Washington, calls it MERMER (memory and encoding related multifaceted electroencephalographic response). It is, he claims, 99.9% accurate at determining the veracity of certain sorts of statement. MERMER works by hooking someone up to a standard EEG machine and asking him about specific details of, for example, a crime scene. Lack of a brainwave called P300 denotes lack of familiarity with the details in question, suggesting any denial should be taken at face value. The technique has already stood up to legal scrutiny twice—once when it supported a conviction, and once when it freed an innocent suspect. It will soon be used again, in the appeal by Jimmy Ray Slaughter, from Oklahoma, against his conviction for murdering his ex-girlfriend, Melody Wuertz, and their 11-month-old daughter, Jessica, in 1991. MERMER suggests that Mr Slaughter had no recollection of important facts about the murder, such as which rooms the victims' bodies were located in. Although not yet foolproof, these three methods do offer possible alternatives to the antiquated techniques of the polygraph. The truth is out there. It is just a question of finding it. Questions Please Log in or Register to view the questions. Answers #msg { color: #333300; background:#ffcc99; border: 1px solid #993300; font: 14px Georgia; width: 600px; text-align: center; } Q1 Your answer was wrong for this question. The correct answer is: bQ2 Your answer was wrong for this question. The correct answer is: dQ3 Your answer was wrong for this question. The correct answer is: bQ4 Your answer was wrong for this question. The correct answer is: cQ5 Your answer was wrong for this question. The correct answer is: aNumber of Questions: 5Number of Attempts: 5Correct Answers: 0 Your Overall Score is -5. This is a below average score. Please give a better try in next test Do you like to you update your new score ? YES Accuracy Indicator Performance Pointer

Reading Comprehension 052

Passage

Painstaking observations of a kind of subatomic dance suggest that the universe may contain a shadowy form of matter that has never been seen directly and is unexplained by standard physics theories, a team of scientists working at Brookhaven National Laboratory on Long Island announced yesterday. The studies appear to confirm similar findings the scientists reported last year. The research involves muons, rare subatomic particles similar to electrons but 207 times as heavy. The work has been controversial, though for reasons that have little to do with the experiment itself. Theorists who are not involved in the research, but whose computational results must be used to interpret it, have recently uncovered errors and uncertainties in their own work. For that reason, the Brookhaven experimenters say they are not ready to claim they have proved a new form of matter exists.

In a weird reflection of the boundless complexity of modern physics, top theorists from around the world were still sending conflicting calculations to the Brookhaven team in the hours before the new findings were disclosed yesterday afternoon at the laboratory. Frustration with the theorists boiled over at the lab, where scientists have been hoping that more than a year of new work would determine whether they had stumbled upon what would be a history-making discovery. The frustration stems from the seeming inability of the theorists to reach a solid conclusion. ''We're telling them, 'Look, you guys, get the damn answer on the table,' '' said Dr. Thomas B. Kirk, Brookhaven's associate director for high energy and nuclear physics.

The researchers found that muons wobbled like microscopic tops, or perhaps frenetic dancers, about 229,074 times a second, when they were placed in a powerful magnetic field in a vacuum chamber. Physicists have long known that such vacuums are not really empty, but are filled with a sea of ''virtual'' particles that flit briefly into existence and back into nothingness again. Like dance partners, the virtual particles change the rate at which the muons wobble. Theoretical physicists have long labored to calculate how much the rate of wobble, or precession, changes as a result of all the known particles in the virtual sea. Using those calculations, the Brookhaven researchers found last year -- and confirmed with the newer studies, involving observations of four billion muons -- that the actual wobble is about 0.6 times a second faster than predicted. The difference, called an anomaly by physicists, means the universe must contain previously undiscovered particles.

''If that sea contains some particles we didn't know about before, that will modify the anomaly,'' said Dr. James Miller, a professor of physics at Boston University -- one of 11 institutions in the United States, Russia, Japan and Germany involved in the experiment -- who presented the results yesterday. ''And the rate of precession is just directly proportional to that anomaly.'' Such a finding would delight many physicists who have been suggesting for years that the accepted theory, called the Standard Model, contains deep conceptual faults that can only be remedied with a more abstruse theory called supersymmetry. That theory predicts that every known particle has a difficult-to-detect partner that has yet to be discovered -- perhaps the extra particles in the virtual sea that the Brookhaven experiment may be detecting.

The initial Brookhaven finding was announced in February 2001. But a group of theorists in Marseille, France, announced in October that they had found a computational error in work led by another highly respected theorist, Dr. Toichiro Kinoshita of Cornell University, which was used to produce the Standard Model's prediction for the wobble. Dr. Kinoshita, who was traveling in Japan and unavailable for comment yesterday, acknowledged that a bug in his computer software had produced the error, said Dr. Sally Dawson, leader of the high-energy theory group at Brookhaven. A revised calculation found that the difference from the Standard Model's prediction, and therefore the evidence that new physics had been discovered, was ''much smaller than before,'' Dr. Dawson said.

That set off a worldwide scramble to refine the calculations further. So as the announcement approached yesterday, Dr. Lee Roberts, a physics professor at Boston University who is a spokesman for the Brookhaven experiment, was still sorting e-mail messages about new, conflicting calculations by theorists from Japan, Russia, Switzerland, England and France. ''Obviously, this is all work in progress,'' Dr. Roberts said. But all the new calculations showed at least some deviation from the Standard Model, he said. A few even suggested huge deviations, he added with a nervous chuckle. Meanwhile, the experimenters have a more immediate worry: the Bush administration has decided to end their financing after this year.

Questions Please Log in or Register to view the questions. Answers #msg { color: #333300; background:#ffcc99; border: 1px solid #993300; font: 14px Georgia; width: 600px; text-align: center; } Q1 Your answer was wrong for this question. The correct answer is: cQ2 Your answer was wrong for this question. The correct answer is: bQ3 Your answer was wrong for this question. The correct answer is: aQ4 Your answer was wrong for this question. The correct answer is: dQ5 Your answer was wrong for this question. The correct answer is: aNumber of Questions: 5Number of Attempts: 5Correct Answers: 0 Your Overall Score is -5. This is a below average score. Please give a better try in next test Do you like to you update your new score ? YES Accuracy Indicator Performance Pointer

Reading Comprehension 051

Passage In what CEO Bill Gates called "an unfortunate but necessary step to protect our intellectual property from theft and exploitation by competitors," the Microsoft Corporation patented the numbers one and zero Monday. With the patent, Microsoft's rivals are prohibited from manufacturing or selling products containing zeroes and ones-the mathematical building blocks of all computer languages and programs-unless a royalty fee of 10 cents per digit used is paid to the software giant. "Microsoft has been using the binary system of ones and zeroes ever since its inception in 1975," Gates told reporters. "For years, in the interest of the overall health of the computer industry, we permitted the free and unfettered use of our proprietary numeric systems. However, changing marketplace conditions and the increasingly predatory practices of certain competitors now leave us with no choice but to seek compensation for the use of our numerals." A number of major Silicon Valley players, including Apple Computer, Netscape and Sun Microsystems, said they will challenge the Microsoft patent as monopolistic and anti-competitive, claiming that the 10-cent-per-digit licensing fee would bankrupt them instantly. "While, technically, Java is a complex system of algorithms used to create a platform-independent programming environment, it is, at its core, just a string of trillions of ones and zeroes," said Sun Microsystems CEO Scott McNealy, whose company created the Java programming environment used in many Internet applications. "The licensing fees we'd have to pay Microsoft every day would be approximately 327,000 times the total net worth of this company." "If this patent holds up in federal court, Apple will have no choice but to convert to analog," said Apple interim CEO Steve Jobs, "and I have serious doubts whether this company would be able to remain competitive selling pedal-operated computers running software off vinyl LPs." As a result of the Microsoft patent, many other companies have begun radically revising their product lines: Database manufacturer Oracle has embarked on a crash program to develop "an abacus for the next millennium." Novell, whose communications and networking systems are also subject to Microsoft licensing fees, is working with top animal trainers on a chimpanzee-based message-transmission system. Hewlett-Packard is developing a revolutionary new steam-powered printer. Despite the swarm of protest, Gates is standing his ground, maintaining that ones and zeroes are the undisputed property of Microsoft. "We will vigorously enforce our patents of these numbers, as they are legally ours," Gates said. "Among Microsoft's vast historical archives are Sanskrit cuneiform tablets from 1800 B.C. clearly showing ones and a symbol known as 'sunya,' or nothing. We also own: papyrus scrolls written by Pythagoras himself in which he explains the idea of singular notation, or 'one'; early tracts by Mohammed ibn Musa al Kwarizimi explaining the concept of al-sifr, or 'the cipher'; original mathematical manuscripts by Heisenberg, Einstein and Planck; and a signed first-edition copy of Jean-Paul Sartre's Being And Nothingness. Should the need arise, Microsoft will have no difficulty proving to the Justice Department or anyone else that we own the rights to these numbers." Added Gates: "My salary also has lots of zeroes. I'm the richest man in the world." According to experts, the full ramifications of Microsoft's patenting of one and zero have yet to be realized. "Because all integers and natural numbers derive from one and zero, Microsoft may, by extension, lay claim to ownership of all mathematics and logic systems, including Euclidean geometry, pulleys and levers, gravity, and the basic Newtonian principles of motion, as well as the concepts of existence and nonexistence," Yale University theoretical mathematics professor J. Edmund Lattimore said. "In other words, pretty much everything." Lattimore said that the only mathematical constructs of which Microsoft may not be able to claim ownership are infinity and transcendental numbers like pi. Microsoft lawyers are expected to file liens on infinity and pi this week. Microsoft has not yet announced whether it will charge a user fee to individuals who wish to engage in such mathematically rooted motions as walking, stretching and smiling. In an address beamed live to billions of people around the globe Monday, Gates expressed confidence that his company's latest move will, ultimately, benefit all humankind. "Think of this as a partnership," Gates said. "Like the ones and zeroes of the binary code itself, we must all work together to make the promise of the computer revolution a reality. As the world's richest, most powerful software company, Microsoft is number one. And you, the millions of consumers who use our products, are the zeroes." Questions Please Log in or Register to view the questions. Answers #msg { color: #333300; background:#ffcc99; border: 1px solid #993300; font: 14px Georgia; width: 600px; text-align: center; } Q1 Your answer was wrong for this question. The correct answer is: cQ2 Your answer was wrong for this question. The correct answer is: dQ3 Your answer was wrong for this question. The correct answer is: bQ4 Your answer was wrong for this question. The correct answer is: bQ5 Your answer was wrong for this question. The correct answer is: dQ6 Your answer was wrong for this question. The correct answer is: dNumber of Questions: 6Number of Attempts: 6Correct Answers: 0 Your Overall Score is -6. This is a below average score. Please give a better try in next test Do you like to you update your new score ? YES Accuracy Indicator Performance Pointer

Sponsered Links

All Rights Reserved. Copyright 2006-10 CAT4MBA.com.